With this commmit, the logic is now:

If the NetMail destination is a point and there's no linked-node for it
   and the boss node for this point is not one of our AKAs
   then route to the boss node (no linked-node match needed)
   if the boss node matches a linked-node with a route configuration
   then route to that configured route destination (2-levels of routing
   and thus 2 "Routing NetMail" msgs will be logged in this scenario)

If the NetMail destination is a point and there is a linked-node for it
   then the netmail will not be routed
		unless that linked node has a route configuration

NetMail destined for non-points are treated the same as before this
commit.

No change in the routing of echomail for points.

I think this change fixes issue #520 which can be traced back to commit
45ced2a3 for poindexter FORTRAN (REALITY), 2 years ago almost to the
day, where that change added point->boss routing, but only if the boss
had a matching linked-node configuration (for both echomail and
netmail).

This commit also re-thinks commit ffe69b43 (for Alterego) which
would not route a point netmail if any our local AKAs matched the
destination address, igorining the point value. I think what was
intended here (I coudln't locate the original enhancmenet request or
issue), was to not route if a local AKA was the *boss* of the point.
And with this commit, that's now how it now works.

As before, "test results appreciated".