-
Rob Swindell authored
These 2 properties, specifically, could be made writable since 1. smb_t.curmsg is a special element owned by the application, not smblib 2. a special sbbs_t.current_msg_number property could be created/used to underlie the bbs.msg_number when there's no open message base (by sbbs). This might be all that's needed to resolve issue #793 The other bbs.msg_* and bbs.smb_* properties are not so easily made writable, so hopefully that's not desired.
Rob Swindell authoredThese 2 properties, specifically, could be made writable since 1. smb_t.curmsg is a special element owned by the application, not smblib 2. a special sbbs_t.current_msg_number property could be created/used to underlie the bbs.msg_number when there's no open message base (by sbbs). This might be all that's needed to resolve issue #793 The other bbs.msg_* and bbs.smb_* properties are not so easily made writable, so hopefully that's not desired.
Loading