From c0adae1f460d1b8d56069275f07c954f54530f71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: deuce <>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:23:37 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Pretty sure we can go ahead and use nanosleep() now.
---
src/xpdev/genwrap.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/xpdev/genwrap.h b/src/xpdev/genwrap.h
index 5e9cf52da9..d114b36832 100644
--- a/src/xpdev/genwrap.h
+++ b/src/xpdev/genwrap.h
@@ -294,9 +294,9 @@ DLLEXPORT int DLLCALL get_errno(void);
tv.tv_sec=(sleep_msecs/1000); tv.tv_usec=((sleep_msecs%1000)*1000); \
pth_nap(tv); })
#else
- #define SLEEP(x) ({ int sleep_msecs=x; struct timeval tv; \
- tv.tv_sec=(sleep_msecs/1000); tv.tv_usec=((sleep_msecs%1000)*1000); \
- select(0,NULL,NULL,NULL,&tv); })
+ #define SLEEP(x) ({ int sleep_msecs=x; struct timespec ts={0}; \
+ ts.tv_sec=(sleep_msecs/1000); ts.tv_nsec=((sleep_msecs%1000)*1000000); \
+ nanosleep(&ts, NULL); })
#endif
#define YIELD() SLEEP(1)
--
GitLab