Synchronet now requires the libarchive development package (e.g. libarchive-dev on Debian-based Linux distros, for more info) to build successfully.

  1. 24 Jul, 2019 9 commits
  2. 23 Jul, 2019 4 commits
  3. 22 Jul, 2019 3 commits
  4. 21 Jul, 2019 4 commits
  5. 20 Jul, 2019 14 commits
  6. 19 Jul, 2019 6 commits
    • deuce's avatar
      Initial pass at AGWPE support. · 57dbd6a9
      deuce authored
      Just a tree of objects and methods so far.
      Not all AGWPE commands are currently supported.
      Main TODOs:
      Connections and ports should have message queues.
      There should be a select() thing that grabs messages and sorts them into queues.
      The queues shoud likely be processed by a node.jsly set of callbacks.
    • rswindell's avatar
      Noticed how the Synchronet Control Panel window, when moved around, · 5c18e217
      rswindell authored
      was just a an outline of the Window? Apparently I set the MainForm's
      DragKind = dkDock at some point, forever ago, and didn't realize it.
      I thought all this time it was C++Builder's fault. :-(
    • rswindell's avatar
      New batch file name for MSVC++ 2019. · 82acf063
      rswindell authored
    • rswindell's avatar
      Typo. :-{ · 7e768838
      rswindell authored
    • rswindell's avatar
      Auto-determine maximum printable header field values (columns - 7), rather · a05dad10
      rswindell authored
      than hard-code to 60 chars - better support for wide terminals.
      Write the newly-defined "3rd line" (editor details) to the result.ed file
      (this is used by latest sbbs for EDITOR msg header field).
      Always write the result.ed file when creating a message, even if the subject
      was not changed. "edit_top==5" is a strange way to determine that you're
      editing a message, but okay...
    • rswindell's avatar
      Support for a 3rd line of RESULT.ED drop file (from external message editors): · 4444e7ff
      rswindell authored
      Full editor name and version details (up to 127 chars), for use in the EDITOR
      msg header field which is propagated over QWK networks.
      From what I could find, the WWIV RESULT.ED file format only ever contained 2
      <Anonymous: 0/1>
      So adding support for an optional 3rd line should be fine and backwards
      compatible. Hopefully WWIV or its message editors don't define a different
      "standard" 3rd line in the future. :-)