Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Select Git revision
  • dailybuild_linux-x64
  • dailybuild_win32
  • master default protected
  • dd_msg_reader_use_dd_msg_area_chooser_and_area_sort_update
  • sqlite
  • rip_abstraction
  • dailybuild_macos-armv8
  • dd_file_lister_filanem_in_desc_color
  • mode7
  • dd_msg_reader_are_you_there_warning_improvement
  • c23-playing
  • syncterm-1.3
  • syncterm-1.2
  • test-build
  • hide_remote_connection_with_telgate
  • 638-can-t-control-c-during-a-file-search
  • add_body_to_pager_email
  • mingw32-build
  • cryptlib-3.4.7
  • ree/mastermind
  • sbbs320d
  • syncterm-1.6
  • syncterm-1.5
  • syncterm-1.4
  • sbbs320b
  • syncterm-1.3
  • syncterm-1.2
  • syncterm-1.2rc6
  • syncterm-1.2rc5
  • push
  • syncterm-1.2rc4
  • syncterm-1.2rc2
  • syncterm-1.2rc1
  • sbbs319b
  • sbbs318b
  • goodbuild_linux-x64_Sep-01-2020
  • goodbuild_win32_Sep-01-2020
  • goodbuild_linux-x64_Aug-31-2020
  • goodbuild_win32_Aug-31-2020
  • goodbuild_win32_Aug-30-2020
40 results

sbbs

  • Clone with SSH
  • Clone with HTTPS
    • Rob Swindell's avatar
    Detect/display menu files, even if only a .ans version exists
    Rob Swindell authored 
    I'm so tired of this 30 year old frequently asked question.

If a sysop really wants their Synchronet BBS to only work correctly for ANSI users, I suppose that should be their prerogative.

I always felt that by not detecting/displaying menu files when the minimum set of files was not present, I was helping sysops to identify an issue with their system (which would not work correctly for non-ANSI users). *And* I always felt that having a single menu/display file that correctly supported both ANSI and non-ANSI users was a nice convenience (who really wants to maintain multiple versions of their menu files?). But I'm so tired of answering this question, I just give up.

Hopefully this doesn't break anything for anyone. <shrug>
    9ac7335f
    History
    Rob Swindell's avatar 9ac7335f
    History
    Name Last commit Last update