Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Select Git revision
  • dailybuild_linux-x64
  • dailybuild_win32
  • master default protected
  • sqlite
  • rip_abstraction
  • dailybuild_macos-armv8
  • dd_file_lister_filanem_in_desc_color
  • mode7
  • dd_msg_reader_are_you_there_warning_improvement
  • c23-playing
  • syncterm-1.3
  • syncterm-1.2
  • test-build
  • hide_remote_connection_with_telgate
  • 638-can-t-control-c-during-a-file-search
  • add_body_to_pager_email
  • mingw32-build
  • cryptlib-3.4.7
  • ree/mastermind
  • new_user_dat
  • sbbs320d
  • syncterm-1.6
  • syncterm-1.5
  • syncterm-1.4
  • sbbs320b
  • syncterm-1.3
  • syncterm-1.2
  • syncterm-1.2rc6
  • syncterm-1.2rc5
  • push
  • syncterm-1.2rc4
  • syncterm-1.2rc2
  • syncterm-1.2rc1
  • sbbs319b
  • sbbs318b
  • goodbuild_linux-x64_Sep-01-2020
  • goodbuild_win32_Sep-01-2020
  • goodbuild_linux-x64_Aug-31-2020
  • goodbuild_win32_Aug-31-2020
  • goodbuild_win32_Aug-30-2020
40 results

sbbs

  • Clone with SSH
  • Clone with HTTPS
  • Rob Swindell (on Windows 11)'s avatar
    Rob Swindell authored
    This should resolve CID 487088: Unchecked return value from library
    as well as add some more instrumentation upon unexpected failures removing
    files.
    
    Consider: do some callers of this function need to know the success status
    (return bool)? That then starts to get into the some callers check and some
    don't situation (Coverity issue). For now, this is a void function.
    
    Also, all remove failures are logged as errors. Consider possibly passing
    a log level and calling lprintf() instead of errormsg(). errormsg() displays
    a notice to the user, which maybe we don't want.
    b8e2c852
    History
    Name Last commit Last update