Paranoia around use of smb.subnum as an index into scfg.sub[]
Use the is_valid_subnum() function before using the smb.subnum as an index into (s)cfg.sub[]. Related to the previous committed fix of writemsg(): leaving the global smb.subnum as -1 (INVALID_SUB) after replying to a post via email or netmail, resulting in a crash here.
parent
2db618ae
No related branches found
No related tags found
Please register or sign in to comment