Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Select Git revision
  • master default protected
  • dailybuild_linux-x64
  • dailybuild_win32
  • sqlite
  • rip_abstraction
  • dailybuild_macos-armv8
  • dd_file_lister_filanem_in_desc_color
  • mode7
  • dd_msg_reader_are_you_there_warning_improvement
  • c23-playing
  • syncterm-1.3
  • syncterm-1.2
  • test-build
  • hide_remote_connection_with_telgate
  • 638-can-t-control-c-during-a-file-search
  • add_body_to_pager_email
  • mingw32-build
  • cryptlib-3.4.7
  • ree/mastermind
  • new_user_dat
  • sbbs320d
  • syncterm-1.6
  • syncterm-1.5
  • syncterm-1.4
  • sbbs320b
  • syncterm-1.3
  • syncterm-1.2
  • syncterm-1.2rc6
  • syncterm-1.2rc5
  • push
  • syncterm-1.2rc4
  • syncterm-1.2rc2
  • syncterm-1.2rc1
  • sbbs319b
  • sbbs318b
  • goodbuild_linux-x64_Sep-01-2020
  • goodbuild_win32_Sep-01-2020
  • goodbuild_linux-x64_Aug-31-2020
  • goodbuild_win32_Aug-31-2020
  • goodbuild_win32_Aug-30-2020
40 results

sbbs

  • Clone with SSH
  • Clone with HTTPS
    • Rob Swindell (on Windows 11)'s avatar
    Fix the recently-added NODE_USER @-code
    Rob Swindell authored 
    Since "NODE*" is a match for a node number status (ugh), and this comparison
happened before the comparison for "NODE_USER", we'd never hit that condition.
Thought I tested this before original commit, but I guess I did not. Oops.
    ad12b9b2
    History
    Rob Swindell (on Windows 11)'s avatar ad12b9b2
    History
    Name Last commit Last update