Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Mar 17, 2024
  2. Dec 02, 2023
  3. Sep 25, 2023
  4. Jul 10, 2023
  5. May 27, 2023
    • Rob Swindell's avatar
      Add -N option to disable to/from name CRC checking · 7d15c6f7
      Rob Swindell authored
      Recently started truncating trailing whitespace from sender/recipient names
      before calculating the CRC value (similar to what we do for message subjects
      as of a year ago). To suppress errors when evaluating messages (with trailing
      whitespace in sender or recipient namems) created or imported before this
      change, use this new -N option.
      7d15c6f7
  6. May 22, 2023
    • Rob Swindell's avatar
      Support new -S option to not check Subject CRCs · 66b28bc9
      Rob Swindell authored
      the Subject CRC calculation was changed in May of 2022 (trailing whitespace is
      removed prior to calculation), so messages imported before this date/revision
      of sbbs might be detected as having an invalid/mismatch Subject CRC. This -S
      option can be used to suppress such errors (for Keyop).
      
      Don't support /option syntax any longer in non-*nix builds (just -options).
      Options are now case-sensitive (i.e. -S and -s are different options).
      Bump version to 3.20.
      66b28bc9
  7. Feb 19, 2023
  8. Jun 05, 2022
  9. Mar 02, 2022
  10. Apr 26, 2021
  11. Apr 04, 2021
  12. Sep 26, 2020
  13. Aug 16, 2020
  14. Apr 04, 2020
  15. Apr 02, 2020
  16. Sep 24, 2019
  17. Jul 23, 2019
  18. Jul 17, 2019
  19. Feb 17, 2019
  20. Feb 16, 2019
  21. Feb 01, 2019
    • rswindell's avatar
      Fix warnings raised by GCC v7.3.0: · c7a96f22
      rswindell authored
      warning: ‘*’ in boolean context, suggest ‘&&’ instead
      note: ‘sprintf’ output between 5 and 132 bytes into a destination of size 128
      c7a96f22
  22. Oct 05, 2018
  23. Jul 17, 2018
  24. Mar 26, 2018
  25. Mar 03, 2018
  26. Feb 21, 2018
  27. Nov 16, 2017
    • rswindell's avatar
      Report errors if the header allocation (sha) or data allocation (sda) · ceef7056
      rswindell authored
      files don't correlate correctly with the data (sdt) or hdr (shd) files.
      Report errors if either the data or hdr file are not a logical length
      (e.g. not evenly divisble by the block length).
      Report the oldest message (in days) in the msgbase, from import date/time.
      
      ToDo: report messages posted/imported (or written) in the future
      ToDo: keep the stats in an array for sensible clearing and reporting
      ceef7056
  28. Dec 01, 2016
  29. Nov 24, 2016
  30. Nov 23, 2016
  31. Nov 16, 2016
    • rswindell's avatar
      Changed SMB_MSG_TYPE_VOTE to SMB_MSG_TYPE_BALLOT: · fed3181c
      rswindell authored
      There (will be) the possibilty to cast mutliple votes in a single vote-msg
      (ballot), when multi-choice polls are introduced later. There were just too
      many things call vote/votes and it was getting confusing in my own head. So the
      msg type for messages that contain votes is now "ballot".
      fed3181c
  32. Nov 08, 2016
    • rswindell's avatar
      Inspired by the U.S. presdential election: · 68a90f31
      rswindell authored
      The beginnings of an SMB-based voting system - very experimental:
      The concept is that a "vote" message can be used to reply to:
      1. A normal message, as either an upvote or a downvote, ala social media
      2. A poll, polls can either allow a single choice answer or multiple answers
      Vote messages won't be visible as normal messages (e.g. when reading messages
      online) and SMB processing software (e.g. SBBSecho) should ignore these
      messages because they have no body text.
      Polls are going to need more work, but the idea is to have the poll question as
      a single (newly defined) hfield and the possible answers as dfields.
      68a90f31
  33. Oct 24, 2012
  34. Oct 15, 2012
  35. Feb 18, 2012
  36. Oct 29, 2011
    • deuce's avatar
      Fix format-related warnings. · 8563ad46
      deuce authored
      This is *likely* to break the Win32 build and even when the macros are
      specified in xpdev, I doubt Microsoft has added support for the 'z' size
      specifier used in smblib/smbadd.c we'll likely need a SIZE_T_SIZE macro
      that is "z" on C99 systems and "ll" or "64" or whatever it is on Win32.
      
      Or maybe a whole slew of complete SIZE_T macros since the 32/64 but thing
      and the max file size thing may actually need the full format specification
      to be in the macro... "zu" on C99 platforms and whatever magic Microsoft
      needs there.
      8563ad46
  37. Oct 07, 2009
  38. Mar 24, 2009
Loading